Mental Help Net
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest NewsQuestions and AnswersBlog EntriesVideosLinksBook Reviews
Therapist Search
Find a Therapist:
 (USA/CAN only)

Use our Advanced Search to locate a therapist outside of North America.

Related Topics

Psychological Testing
Mental Disorders
Mental Health Professions
Treatments & Interventions

Christy Matta, M.A.Christy Matta, M.A.
A Blog on Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Mindfulness and Stress Reduction

Are We Predisposed to Believe?

Christy Matta, M.A. Updated: Dec 7th 2010

It's the holidays. Hanukkah has started and Christmas is nearing. With them come shopping, gift giving, greeting cards, celebration, music, games, decorations and the mythical figure of Santa Clause. Christmas trees, menorah's, lights, and garlands line streets and decorate stores.

angel figurineBut are the holidays about all the celebrations and customs of our culture, or are they about religion, spiritual belief and prayer. Does God make miracles for those who stand up for truth and justice? Was a baby born in a manger and visited by angels and wise men?

According to an article in the December 2010 issue of the Monitor on Psychology, religion has survived and thrived for more than 100,000 years. Psychologists have tried to understand the underpinnings of religious belief and why religious beliefs are so enduring.

The article summarizes research in neuroscience and psychology that is finding that religion has endured by helping us form increasingly larger social groups. These groups are held together by common beliefs~ religious beliefs.

Although scientists have not found any one thought process that underlies religious belief, they have found that even young children tend to believe that aspects of our world were created with purpose. Adults also tend to search for meaning and may be primed to see patterns in the world around them.

Researchers believe that this predisposition to believe may have been adaptive, an "unavoidable byproduct of the way our minds work." So are we predisposed to believe? The answer seems to be yes. Is religion, then, simply an adaptive tool? The field of psychology doesn't have an answer to that question.

Most religious thought is no different, neurologically, than everyday thinking. Contemplative prayer and meditation are the exceptions. Richard Davidson, Ph.D. has measured brain activity of Buddhist monks using both fMRI and EEG. His findings show that meditation- and possibly contemplative prayer- can change the circuits in the brain.

Many psychological treatments ignore the role of religion and spiritual belief, some, like DBT, incorporate mental exercises designed to improve the regulation of emotion and attention, which are similar to contemplative prayer and meditation found in most religions. Although psychology is not going to provide answers about the baby in the manger or miracles, we might choose to take the view of Thomas Plante, PhD, who sees our increasing understanding of religious thought as a way to see ourselves as "more whole." Rather than viewing opposing camps of science or religion, according to Plante, we can see ourselves as "whole people; the biological, psychological, social, cultural and spiritual are all connected."


Christy Matta, M.A.

Christy Matta M.A. is a trainer, consultant and writer. She is the author of “The Stress Response: How Dialectical Behavior Therapy Can Free You from Needless Anxiety, Worry, Anger, and Other Symptoms of Stress.” She is intensively trained in DBT and has designed and provided clinical supervision to treatment programs, including a winner of the American Psychiatric Association Gold Award. Matta has a Master of Arts in counseling psychology from Boston College. For more on her consultation and trainings visit her web site For more tips and mindfulness tips and strategies visit her blog

Reader Comments
Discuss this issue below or in our forums.

Link to the Article referred to in the post - Christy Matta, M.A. - Dec 9th 2010

Here is a link to the article referenced in the post.

It ain't necessarily so - John Allman - Dec 8th 2010

The above article is a comment on an article elsewhere that doesn't actually cite the article elsewhere, so nobody can check what that says.  This article says that the other article cites some primary sources, but does not cite any itself.  Consequently, nobody can check what this article asserts.

I don't think that such scholarship compels one to believe the article's core assertion, that it nowadays amounts to a finding of science, that religious belief is selected for by evolution, because it enables larger social groups.  However, this article is the sort of writing that comforts the atheistic sloppy thinker, and niggles the believer, until the latter spots the flaws.

It is to be expected that science, an endeavour that typically seeks a cause for every phenomenon, will find at least one putative cause for belief in God, that doesn't rely on God as part of the explanation.  Time was when scientists refrained from publishing hypotheses that they new darn well it was impossible for anybody to test experimentally, like the hypothesis that this article peddles, the hypothesis that the enabling of larger social groups has selected for predisposition to "religious" belief.

Follow us on Twitter!

Find us on Facebook!

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify.This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.

Powered by CenterSite.Net